:: Go To Library 2.0 ::

By Michael Casey & Michael Stephens — Library Journal, 10/15/2008

The rules of marketing have changed. Do libraries know that?

Corporate PR-types used to control the message. Sitting behind a desk, they’d write a carefully crafted press release and then send it off to newspapers and upload it to their web site. The attention the company got might barely justify the salary of the PR professional.

Today’s world is fundamentally different. Neither news nor brand identity are controlled through press releases or carefully choreographed newspaper articles. Brands are molded and shaped by the audience—and the audience is everyone. People talk. And people listen.

Social tools, social media, and social engagement are the norms for many large advertisers that have populated sites like Facebook and Twitter with brand-focused pages and interactive techniques. Are you following your favorite brand?

Are libraries catching up?

Not all libraries have embraced this world. Just as some IT departments block new tools because of unfounded security fears, some library PR departments are holding out from using these new 2.0 tools. We’ve heard from librarians who tell us they are blocked by a PR person—often acting on orders from above—who will not allow multiple voices, direct customer engagement/feedback, or any type of library message that hasn’t been vetted.

It’s nice to think that you can control the outflow of information and discussion, but the truth is, you can’t. Those days are gone. Staffers talk to customers, and customers talk to customers. It’s no longer possible to control a solitary message from one central location.

As our followers on Twitter reminded us, the grapevine can be a good thing. “Even stories told to friends and family carry weight,” one observed. In fact, libraries have internal and external grapevines. How can we use both to the benefit of all? One thing we know for sure: trying to silence the grapevine hurts the organization.

Keep watch online

The mechanisms for PR 2.0 are varied and sometimes overwhelming. PR maven Brian Solis’s “Conversation Prism” identifies 22 different channels of social tools where discussions take place and stories are told. We strongly advocate that library staff participate in these discussions, answering both the easy questions and the hard ones, as well.

Remember, if you don’t participate in the story, it will be told without you. Consider the not entirely positive reviews of the central library in Minneapolis on the popular review site Yelp.com. “The library itself is spectacular,” one library user wrote on July 2, 2008. “The librarians are kind of surly. Hate the fact that they’re closed Sunday and Monday.”

Why hasn’t a nonsurly library employee responded? Not only should librarians monitor these conversations, we should respond in such cases with thanks for the positive reviews and “how can we do better” to the negative ones.

What you can do

With this important sea change in mind, we offer some guidelines for your library’s marketing 2.0 program.

PR-speak stinks. Happy-time press releases and spin that lack a human feel will not go as far as an honest announcement. If you’ve tried something and it hasn’t gone well, tell your users. If you’ve had great success, do the same.

Anticipate the questions and answer them. Explain new services or respond to breaking news stories, then ask users what else they’d like to know.

Monitor and participate in the conversation about and around your library via the social tools featured in the Prism. Staff at all levels should be actively involved in telling the library’s story. Ad hoc marketing committees can spring up easily to promote the next big thing at the library.

Think about your library brand. What is it? How can you tell the story of your brand with your users? How can they add to the brand? Deirdre Breakenridge’s book PR 2.0: New Media, New Tools, New Audiences (FT Press) offers a primer that we’ve drawn on here.

In fact, our users should be part of the library’s brand. The Columbus Metropolitan Library, OH, does a wonderful job of putting staffers’ faces on the library’s homepage. The Vancouver Public Library, BC, puts patrons on its homepage, touting the library’s benefits.

Beyond that, it’s time for all libraries to feature user photos, recommendations, and more front and center on their web sites, in the catalog, and in all of the library’s marketing efforts.

Sources

WEll, I won’t physically be there…but:

http://www.america.gov/multimedia/askamerica.html#librarians

The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) will hold its annual World Library and Information Congress, the 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, from August 23 to August 29 in Milan, Italy. Leaders in the field of library and information sciences from across the globe will gather at the conference, including representatives from U.S. Embassy libraries.

Join U.S. Embassy Rome and CO.NX as we host a series of video webchats in conjunction with the IFLA conference. From August 23 to August 25, leading American librarians will discuss issues of importance to the library and information sciences community and take questions related to the field via live video webchats.

The schedule of upcoming chats and topics is as follows:

• Michael Stephens, assistant professor in the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at Dominican University in Illinois, discussing “Library 2.0 and Social Networking Technologies” on August 23, 15:30 GMT (11:30 a.m. EDT)

• Josie Parker, director of the Ann Arbor District Library in Michigan, discussing “Innovating Public Library Programs” on August 24, 11:00 GMT (7 a.m. EDT)

• Meaghan O’Connor, program coordinator at IREX (the International Research and Exchanges Board, a nonprofit organization), discussing “Sister Libraries” on August 24, 15:00 GMT (11 a.m. EDT)

• Erich Kesse, past director of the Digital Library Center at the University of Florida, discussing “International and Collaborative Digital Library Projects” on August 25, 11:00 GMT (7 a.m. EDT)

• María Gentle, Youth services librarian for the Arlington Public Libary in Virginia, discussing “Youth Services/Teen Services and Outreach” on August 25, 13:00 GMT (9 a.m. EDT)

• Karen Coombs, head of Web services at the University of Houston in Texas, discussing “Making the Most of Your Library’s Internet Presence” on August 25, 15:00 GMT (11 a.m. EDT)

The general public is invited to participate in these webchats. To do so, please go to http://statedept.connectsolutions.com/ifla. No registration is needed. Simply choose “Enter as a Guest,” type in your preferred screen name, and join the discussion. We accept questions and comments in advance of, and at any time during, the program.

Shevonne from MakeTechEasier posts about 10 Useful Tips for Tricking Out FriendFeed. This helpful guide walks users through how to get set up and use this social media tool effectively. Here are the post’s top five tips:

1. Aggregate All (or Majority) of Your Feeds
2. Setup Your Notifications
3. Select Twitter Publishing Preferences
4. Choose a Theme
5. Edit Your Profile

Library 2.0 is a loosely defined model for a modernized form of library service that reflects a transition within the library world in the way that services are delivered to users. The focus is on user-centered change and participation in the creation of content and community. ^[1] The concept of Library 2.0 borrows from that of Business 2.0 and Web 2.0 and follows some of the same underlying philosophies. This includes online services like the use of OPAC systems and an increased flow of information from the user back to the library.

With Library 2.0, library services are constantly updated and reevaluated to best serve library users. Library 2.0 also attempts to harness the library user in the design and implementation of library services by encouraging feedback and participation. Proponents of this concept, sometimes referred to as Radical Trust expect that the Library 2.0 model for service will ultimately replace traditional, one-directional service offerings that have characterized libraries for centuries.

Overview

The term “Library 2.0″ was coined by Michael Casey on his blog LibraryCrunch as a direct spin-off of the terms Business 2.0 and Web 2.0. Casey suggested that libraries, especially public libraries, are at a crossroads where many of the elements of Web 2.0 have applicable value within the library community, both in technology-driven services and in non-technology based services. In particular, he described the need for libraries to adopt a strategy for constant change while promoting a participatory role for library users.

Library 2.0 made its conference debut at Internet Librarian 2005 in October, 2005, when Michael Stephens of Saint Joseph County Public Library addressed the idea in relation to the typical library website.

A September, 2006, article in Library Journal, titled “Library 2.0: Service for the next-generation library,” begins by expressing the benefit of Library 2.0 to library administrators and taxpayers as providing “more efficient ways of delivering services to achieve greater returns on financial investments.” The article continued by asserting that the much discussed Library 2.0 is important for librarians as it may radically change our customer service and interaction.^[1]

With Library 2.0, library services are frequently evaluated and updated to meet the changing needs of library users. Library 2.0 also calls for libraries to encourage user participation and feedback in the development and maintenance of library services. The active and empowered library user is a significant component of Library 2.0. With information and ideas flowing in both directions – from the library to the user and from the user to the library – library services have the ability to evolve and improve on a constant and rapid basis. The user is participant, co-creator, builder and consultant – whether the product is virtual or physical.

Jason Fitzpatrick at Lifehacker lists the Five Best Movie Cataloging Tools for those interested in keeping tabs on their collections. Be sure and read the full article for details about cost, features, and screenshots of these and more apps:

1. Delicious Library
2. DVD Profiler
3. Collectorz Movie Collector

A fascinating article by Michael Jensen from Chronicle Review, the Chronicle of Higher education, The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority ( June 15, 2007), discusses scholarly communication now in the abundance of Web 2.0 information, and in a Web 3.0 era. Engaged participation online challenges the authority frameworks of print publishing processes, and opens the doors to authority mechanisms in Web 3.0 based on heavily computed reputation-and-authority metrics, using many of the kinds of elements now used, as well as on elements that can be computed only in an information-rich, user-engaged environment.

For universities, the challenge will be ensuring that scholars who are making more and more of their material available online will be fairly judged in hiring and promotion decisions. It will mean being open to the widening context in which scholarship is published, and it will mean that faculty members will have to take the time to learn about — and give credit for — the new authority metrics, instead of relying on scholarly publishers to establish the importance of material for them.

[Source : Michael Habib]

Written Statements:
Title Code: Go To Library 2.0
Hosting: go2library2.wordpress.com
Interests: Library 2.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0, semantic web, the Librarian 2.0, web 2.0.

A welcome message:

Welcome to all visitors … interested in the field of specialized libraries and information .. For more than a year and I think in the implementation and the formation of a window in the fields of interest in second-generation techniques for Libraries (Library 2.0) Given during the period of my previous delays in the implementation of that dream.

Your Brother …